-
“Big Money” will win on ballot issues — True that big money may influence ballot campaigns,
but already special interests are influencing the legislature with a lot less money than it would
take to influence a ballot question. Therefore the initiative process is clearly less corrupted than
the legislative process. And rigorous campaign finance reporting will expose where the money
is coming from. National experience in other states shows no conclusive evidence that “big
money” campaigns can guarantee a “Yes” or “No” vote on a measure. For example:- Big money did not sway the voters on the gambling issue in 1994. Citizens in West
Greenwich raised $500 to defeat a massive campaign for a casino in their town. - In California, in 2004, gambling interests failed despite $100 million spending by tribe
and other gambling interests. - Chip Faulkner, Associate Director of “Citizens for Limited Taxation” (CLT) in
Massachusetts, has stated that their group has won 4 out of 5 initiatives and they were
outspent on 4 of them. - Bill Sizemore, Executive Director of Oregon Taxpayers United, stated in USA Today,
Oct. 23, 2000, “Opponents of the initiative process claim that money and specialinterest
groups have taken over the initiative process. But when you consider all of those
hundreds of special-interest groups and paid lobbyists who haunt the halls of every state
legislature, the initiative process looks squeaky clean. Our organization has won seven
of nine ballot-measure campaigns in Oregon, and we’ve been outspent an average of
about 8-1.” - M. Dane Waters in “The Initiative and Referendum Almanac” 2003, states, “In the last
decade alone numerous wealthy individuals have tried to enact reform through the
initiative process only to lose after spending millions of dollars.” - Professor Liz Gerber of the University of California authored The Populist Paradox
(Princeton University Press, 1999) researched and found that when citizen groups are
able to mobilize sufficient financial resources to get out their message, they are much
more successful at the ballot box, even when economic interest groups greatly outspend
them.
- Big money did not sway the voters on the gambling issue in 1994. Citizens in West
- Initiatives will clutter the ballot — You hear about the large number of ballot questions in
California. About 75 percent of those are introduced by legislators, not voters. And yet, polling
of California voters show that overwhelmingly they prefer to keep the voter initiative process.
From the “I&R Almanac,” “In 1999-2000, Portrait of America (POA) conducted a series of
statewide telephone polls that asked voters if the initiative and referendum (I&R) process was
good public policy.” Statewide samplings were 1,000 voters. In all states a majority of voters
responded “yes” with only five states below 55%. The 24 states that already have I&R had the
highest percentage of supporters and those states that used the process more frequently in the
four years prior to the poll had the highest scores. - Initiatives are a tool of the “special interests” — In fact, the opposite is true. Look at the
opposition to Initiative. It is the special interests who influence the General Assembly with a lot
less money and effort. They fear giving the people a mechanism for expressing the public will. - The voters can’t understand complex issues — Thomas Jefferson said it best “I know of no
safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people, and if we think them not
enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take the power form them, but to inform them
Last updated May 21, 2012